Somehow you wind up on their radar
I don't know for certain why I did, or why anybody does. But I don't think it's largely, in most cases, by random chance. I can only guess. My mother had a lost time episode when she was about 12. Both my mother and father saw a UFO in 1966, before they got married, about 4 years before I was born. Those are the big boxes people like to tick, generational. I'm sure it does have a lot to do with it. But with me, it didn't start till I was about 40. They left me alone, as far as I know, up to then. It think for me it began in 2002, I did something that put me on their radar.
I first ran into the issue of the moon hoax that year. Initially, I thought there might be something to it, but I didn't know enough about the subject to say one way or the other. I decided to investigate it for myself. I began work on the premise that lies have to be told to cover the original lie. Pretty soon the lies told would pile up, until the lies began to contradict each other. Every tangled web of lies winds up that way. And none of them are perfectly constructed. Lies always give away earlier lies, because it reaches a point where nobody can keep track of them all. All I had to do was read everything, study all the photos and films, then begin comparing them against each other to find the contradictions. Nobody tells a perfectly consistent lie.
Over the course of doing so, I became so familiar with the material and how each piece relates to another, that I became something of an expert on the subject. There is a website called The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. It's a depository for every known historical fact about the 7 Apollo moon landing missions. I was a contributor to it. When I found errors, I'd correct them. If I found things that weren't included I'd point them out to the Curator, a man named Eric Jones. You'll find my name in the margin notes there in a few places. Here's an example of a error I discovered.
[LM2LWC (nasa.gov)](https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11LM2LWC.html)
I'm the Scott Cruicksnhank mentioned in the first paragraph at the top. I studied the Apollo 11 mission closely for 8 years. I never came to the conclusion in the end that the moon hoax was real. They did actually go there. But... there are things about those missions they never told us about. Lots of things. I rooted out a few of them over those 8 years. But there's only one thing I can tell you with absolute certainty I was correct about. There is life on the moon.
It's likely single celled, microscopic, and exists either on the surface or just below the surface of the soil. It was discovered in 1967 by the Lunar Surveyor robotic landers that were sent to potential Apollo landing sites. They were equipped with a TV camera, a scoop shovel on a robotic arm, and a penetrometer to test load bearing capacity. What they found was that the very top layer of the soil broke up in sheets. The soil had a crust on it. Similar to what you see in a freshly plowed farm field after it rains. Now a soil crust only forms in one of three ways. Impact by raindrops, cementation of the soil by a cementing agent like calcium in the wet soil, or by the third mechanism which is crusting formed by biological organisms in the soil. We know it doesn't rain on the moon, they never found the soil to be wet or muddy. That leaves only one possibility, biological organisms. Probably something like cyanobacteria. Look that up if you're unfamiliar with it. It's probably an organism very similar to that.
You can see the crust in As-11-40-5877. It's a photo of Buzz Aldrin's bootprint. To the right of the bootprint, you can see where the soil is kind of broken up and the crust has become loosened and shifted over.
[AS11-40-5877HR.jpg (2349×2369) (nasa.gov)](https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5877HR.jpg)
They kept the existence of that crust very quiet. Nobody ever spoke about it publicly, because of what it meant. They knew there was life there on the moon before the first Apollo astronaut ever set foot there, but for probably a whole host of reasons, they didn't want anyone else to know. At least three Apollo astronauts, Armstrong, Cernan and Schmidt, had allergic reactions to it. In the case of Armstrong it was hushed up completely. But with Cernan and Schmidt, they actually talked about it over the radio with the controllers in Houston openly while they were there. Though you would first have to know about the crust and the allergen it contains in order to make sense of what they were saying. So even though they talked about it, it was still somewhat hidden to anybody who didn't already know about it.
That was just about the last thing I stumbled on before I had to give up around 2010. All the craziness at night began shortly after that. I can't help but think somehow they're related in some way.
I first ran into the issue of the moon hoax that year. Initially, I thought there might be something to it, but I didn't know enough about the subject to say one way or the other. I decided to investigate it for myself. I began work on the premise that lies have to be told to cover the original lie. Pretty soon the lies told would pile up, until the lies began to contradict each other. Every tangled web of lies winds up that way. And none of them are perfectly constructed. Lies always give away earlier lies, because it reaches a point where nobody can keep track of them all. All I had to do was read everything, study all the photos and films, then begin comparing them against each other to find the contradictions. Nobody tells a perfectly consistent lie.
Over the course of doing so, I became so familiar with the material and how each piece relates to another, that I became something of an expert on the subject. There is a website called The Apollo Lunar Surface Journal. It's a depository for every known historical fact about the 7 Apollo moon landing missions. I was a contributor to it. When I found errors, I'd correct them. If I found things that weren't included I'd point them out to the Curator, a man named Eric Jones. You'll find my name in the margin notes there in a few places. Here's an example of a error I discovered.
[LM2LWC (nasa.gov)](https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11LM2LWC.html)
I'm the Scott Cruicksnhank mentioned in the first paragraph at the top. I studied the Apollo 11 mission closely for 8 years. I never came to the conclusion in the end that the moon hoax was real. They did actually go there. But... there are things about those missions they never told us about. Lots of things. I rooted out a few of them over those 8 years. But there's only one thing I can tell you with absolute certainty I was correct about. There is life on the moon.
It's likely single celled, microscopic, and exists either on the surface or just below the surface of the soil. It was discovered in 1967 by the Lunar Surveyor robotic landers that were sent to potential Apollo landing sites. They were equipped with a TV camera, a scoop shovel on a robotic arm, and a penetrometer to test load bearing capacity. What they found was that the very top layer of the soil broke up in sheets. The soil had a crust on it. Similar to what you see in a freshly plowed farm field after it rains. Now a soil crust only forms in one of three ways. Impact by raindrops, cementation of the soil by a cementing agent like calcium in the wet soil, or by the third mechanism which is crusting formed by biological organisms in the soil. We know it doesn't rain on the moon, they never found the soil to be wet or muddy. That leaves only one possibility, biological organisms. Probably something like cyanobacteria. Look that up if you're unfamiliar with it. It's probably an organism very similar to that.
You can see the crust in As-11-40-5877. It's a photo of Buzz Aldrin's bootprint. To the right of the bootprint, you can see where the soil is kind of broken up and the crust has become loosened and shifted over.
[AS11-40-5877HR.jpg (2349×2369) (nasa.gov)](https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5877HR.jpg)
They kept the existence of that crust very quiet. Nobody ever spoke about it publicly, because of what it meant. They knew there was life there on the moon before the first Apollo astronaut ever set foot there, but for probably a whole host of reasons, they didn't want anyone else to know. At least three Apollo astronauts, Armstrong, Cernan and Schmidt, had allergic reactions to it. In the case of Armstrong it was hushed up completely. But with Cernan and Schmidt, they actually talked about it over the radio with the controllers in Houston openly while they were there. Though you would first have to know about the crust and the allergen it contains in order to make sense of what they were saying. So even though they talked about it, it was still somewhat hidden to anybody who didn't already know about it.
That was just about the last thing I stumbled on before I had to give up around 2010. All the craziness at night began shortly after that. I can't help but think somehow they're related in some way.
